Friday 14 March 2014

Brands themselves are the media owners now

I've just followed a Twitter conversation between McVitie's Biscuits and Dulux Paint.

One of the weirder developments of recent years has been the personification of consumer brands on social media. At first it was just awkward, but now some brands are doing it really well.

All are working strenuously to develop an 'emotional connection' with their audiences, which is why you can't watch a YouTube clip by a tour operator or fizzy drink company these days without being reduced to tears.

The ones that get it right seem to have cracked the basics of good publishing: Target a community, understand it, and then surprise it with engaging content. Red Bull, which has attracted 42 million likes on Facebook,  has its own publishing unit complete with a 2.2 million circulation print magazine, feature film, events, and a growing inventory of good film clips, interviews and stories. Their work is of high quality and they are disciplined - focusing all their efforts on people who like adventure sports.



Another company selling a seemingly commoditised product, Dove, attracted 62 million YouTube views for their superb 'forensic artist' clip. They don't just retail soap any more, they offer self-esteem - and having ploughed that furrow for about a decade now they've earned a certain amount of credibility.


Given the relative ease and affordability of creating, managing and distributing content why wouldn't a brand want to own its relationship with customers rather than relying on third parties to mediate? Media isn't shrinking - it's changing. The future of consumer media lies, in large part, within the burgeoning content divisions of brands themselves.



New York Times online is 18 years old this year

In 1996 the New York Times went online… and that was eighteen years ago! The website has reached New York State’s age of majority.
NYT 1996 home pageIt was already clear by the mid-90′s that the then treacle-slow World Wide Web would become the platform of choice for all sorts of content – including news and comment – once it became fast and affordable for ordinary people. If anything the surprise is that in 2014 print still takes such a large share.
Sadly the NYT couldn’t eke out enough revenue from online display advertising to cover the decline in print, and it is a much smaller business today. Marketers have more powerful tools at their disposal and readers have access to seas of content – much of it very good. I hope, though, that the newly mature NYT gets to enjoy its adulthood for a few more years, and that its DNA survives in new forms even as the old platforms become frail and pass away.

“We don’t make copiers anymore. Meet the new Xerox”

xerox
A promoted tweet I couldn't help clicking on. Well done Xerox, well done Twitter.
It turns out not to be *quite* the case. Certainly nobody told the ecommerce team, whose homepage is crammed with promotions for hardware and ink, but Xerox are keen to show their evolution into a solutions provider and innovator, and point to initiatives such asIgnite that helps teachers test students and analyse the resulting data to provide bespoke feedback on each child - indicating where their learning needs are most acute.
It reminded me of the nice Telegraph poster from last year – pointing out that IBM once manufactured weighing scales and Nokia produced wellington boots.
telegraph-ad